This brings me to the aspect of the article that I find most offensive, the implication that music is like a science of emotional manipulation through sound, and that it’s as simple as applying a “formula” to achieve commercial and artistic success. Not only is it belittling to musicians and listeners everywhere, it also implies a very narrow view of musical craft.

This is the article that should have appeared in the Wall Street Journal, instead of a new music online journal where all the people reading it know all of this stuff already.

  1. eximplode reblogged this from d00dt00nz and added:
    I don’t really have much to add to this. But I guess I’ll say that whoever wrote this article is acting like there’s...
  2. juri2127 reblogged this from leadingtone
  3. eflauta reblogged this from leadingtone and added:
    That article really bothered me, so I’m glad to see a rebuttal.
  4. willyvernia reblogged this from leadingtone
  5. itsjustseachelle reblogged this from leadingtone
  6. d00dt00nz reblogged this from leadingtone
  7. jevinalmazan reblogged this from leadingtone
  8. oliveyouido reblogged this from leadingtone
  9. peppermintpatchwork reblogged this from leadingtone
  10. psl reblogged this from leadingtone
  11. bataleur reblogged this from leadingtone
  12. canuhandelthis reblogged this from leadingtone
  13. thalliam reblogged this from leadingtone
  14. auroraglorialis reblogged this from leadingtone
  15. leadingtone reblogged this from imaginarydances and added:
    Seems like I remember rolling my eyes at the original WSJ article a few weeks ago. It nebulously recounts a study by...
  16. hikouki-gumo reblogged this from imaginarydances
  17. imaginarydances reblogged this from ifnyousayso
  18. ifnyousayso reblogged this from one-rare-salad
  19. one-rare-salad posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus